Risk Assessment Methodology
LinkedInEmailGitHub
Summary

This risk assessment methodology demonstrates how I identify, evaluate, and prioritize security risk across an organization's assets — mapping technical findings to business impact so leadership can make informed, defensible decisions about where to invest limited resources.

Built for:

  • Demonstrating a repeatable risk assessment process aligned to recognized frameworks
  • Showing how raw vulnerability data becomes prioritized, business-context risk
  • Supporting security program planning, audit readiness, and compliance efforts

Methodology

The assessment follows a structured, NIST-aligned lifecycle:

  • Scoping & Asset Identification — Define assessment boundaries, catalog in-scope systems and data, and assign value and criticality to each asset.
  • Threat Identification — Identify relevant threat sources and events across adversarial, accidental, and environmental categories.
  • Vulnerability Identification — Map weaknesses that threats could exploit, drawing on scan data, configuration reviews, and stakeholder interviews.
  • Likelihood Determination — Assess the probability of exploitation based on threat capability, intent, and the strength of existing controls.
  • Impact Analysis — Evaluate consequences to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as well as to business operations and reputation.
  • Risk Determination & Prioritization — Combine likelihood and impact into qualitative risk ratings, then rank findings so the highest-severity risks are addressed first.
  • Control Recommendations — Pair each prioritized risk with actionable, cost-aware mitigation guidance.

Frameworks & Standards Applied

  • NIST SP 800-30 — Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments
  • NIST SP 800-37 — Risk Management Framework (RMF)
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) — control and outcome alignment

Skills demonstrated: risk analysis and qualitative risk scoring, NIST framework alignment, control gap analysis, and the ability to translate technical detail into executive-ready risk language.

The attached report applies this methodology end-to-end as a working sample of the deliverable.

Supporting Documents